Rental Services, Inc. 2019 March Newsletter
If you are
not paying attention to what’s going on with your state legislature, it’s time
to wake up and get in the game. Rent Control was passed in Oregon and there is
already talk about expanding it across the nation. Colorado moves closer to
passing rental application reform with HB19-1106 and will impact fees and
possibly time frames for criminal record usage.
Recently the
state of Oregon became the first in the country to implement a statewide rent
control law. The new law prevents property owners from raising the annual rent
more then 7%. Many groups are looking at this as a quick solution to provide
affordable housing in markets all over the country.
Rent control
is under serious consideration by law makers all over the United States. If
rent control legislation is passed everywhere it is currently being discussed
nearly 1/3 of the country’s rental housing would be impacted by rent control.
Advocates
site California, Maryland, New York, New Jersey, and Washington DC, as
providing the largest source of affordable housing based on current rent-controlled
units. It is believed that rent control programs are a cost-effective method to
increase affordable housing.
On the other
side of the argument is the property owner who is directly impacted by rent
control. Some property owners believe rent control is unconstitutional and is a
form of privatized welfare. Why should a property owner have to accept below
market valuation for rent based on the government’s desire to show compassion
towards a tenant? What’s next? If a person owns a restaurant should they be
limited to how much they can charge a patron for a meal? We wouldn’t want
anyone to go hungry because they can’t afford the price of a meal.
If you would
like to discuss rent control in more detail make sure to visit the Rental
Services, Inc. Facebook page and leave a comment.
On a
different note, Colorado HB19-1106 has been picking up steam. The bill to address
the application process currently has bi-partisan support and looks like it is
going to pass.
The bill
addresses charging an application fee that is equal to the actual screening
fee. If more money is collected, then the actual cost for the background
screening report the balance would need to be refunded back to the applicant. The
bill will also make it illegal to charge different screening fees to applicants
applying for the same or similar rental unit.
A receipt
for the application payment will need to be given to the applicant. The receipt
can be given in an electronic format unless the applicant requests a paper
receipt.
The bill
will address the time frame for usable records in the background check. The
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) sets limits of seven years for credit
information and Colorado CRS 12-14-.3-105.3 (1)(e) states No consumer reporting
agency shall make any consumer report containing any of the following items of
information: (e) Records of indictment or conviction of a crime that, from the
date of disposition, release, or parole, predate the report by more than seven
years.
My biggest
concern is the proposed limitation of the criminal time frame to five years.
I’m always against limiting the amount of information a client can receive to
make an informed business decision.
Adverse
notifications will be required as part of HB19-1106 and is already addressed
under the FCRA.
I would recommend
preparing for HB19-1106 to pass. Make sure you have documentation that explains
your application fee. Adding a section to your rental criteria would meet this requirement.
Adjust your application fee to match your screening fee and provide a receipt.
If you use the RSI Quick App it will send out an electronic receipt or if you
use the 2ply RSI paper application the yellow copy can act as a paper receipt. Familiarize
yourself with access to the adverse action noticed provided with each RSI
background report and when necessary, send them to the applicant.
Comments
Post a Comment